Arts Education Essay

The purpose of this bibliography is to attain knowledge from credible sources on humanistic discipline programs in schools. The destruction is to provide enough knowledge so that the reader is then fitting to form their own opinions on the benefits, problems, and policies on humanities programs at varying aims of tuition. Those feel to bugger off detailed information go out denudation this bibliography to be a expert starting point. Parsad, B. , and Spiegelman, M. 2012. gratis(p) humanities command in Public Elementary and second-string Schools 19992000 and 200910 (NCES 2012014). matter Center for Education Statistics, bring of Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. Web. 24 Jan. 2013 This source is a give birthation of unbiased information around two(prenominal) the overall arts education programs and circumstantial sections including optical arts, music, dance, and flying field/drama. The explanation utilizes a plethora of chart s, graphs, and early(a) visual aids to help organize and present the information.Parsad and Spiegelman first present their conclusions on overall arts education programs including the percentages of schools offering visual arts, music, dance and theater classes. They then dedicate ten to fifteen pages discussing the particulars of apiece section of the arts listed above. thither is so practically information in this expression that it would be groovy for almostone looking for a broad spectrum apprehensiveness of arts education programs. The visual aids concomitant the information presented and would be easy to incorporate into a variety of works.For someone who is looking to get real specific information about a specific program then this would be a good source to start with, the way the tell is divided up makes it very easy to find information on a specific sections of an arts program, i. e. music or drama. It would provide the reader with enough information that they c ould select their own questions and be able to look go on into a specific topic. Catterall, Dumais, and Hampden-Thompson. March 2012. The arts and movement in at-risk youth findings from four longitudinal studies. National Endowment for the Arts. Research Report 55). Web. 24 Jan. 2013. This explore survey is a display of years of studies conducted by the National Endowment for the Arts and similar organizations, close being government funded. The authors arrange the business relationship in much(prenominal) a way that the bulk of the spread over is given with the put on of visual graphs and charts, which atomic number 18 accompanied by conclusive statements like Teenagers and untested adults of low socioeconomic status (SES) who have a history of in-depth arts involvement show weaken academic outcomes than do low-SES youth who have slight arts involvement.They earn better grades and demonstrate higher(prenominal) rates of college enrollment and attainment. (12) Mos t of the graphs simply uphold percentages of students with low and high levels of art engagement to chance on certain things like high school graduation, get in a bachelors program, and attaining a steady professional level career. For every study and graph presented or reviewed in that respect is clearly cited sources, if any confusion remains the adjunct and cited pages are very clear about how to find to a greater extent information. Being that this is a report of findings from a national organization it is not biased to or for deport of arts programs.For anyone looking for specific statistics to use in a presentation or report of their own, this research report could be very accommodative. As previously stated the bulk of the information is presented through graphs and charts that utilize percentages, and is therefore very easy to take hold and use in a presentation without having to do much work yourself. For someone looking for a more scholarly breakdown of the benefit s of arts education on high-risk students this report will not be as helpful, as it would be line consuming to trace the information presented back to the master copy sources. Dwyer, M.Christine. 2011. Reinvesting in Arts Education Winning the Statess Future through Creative Schools. prexys committal on the Arts and the Humanities. Web. 24 Jan. 2013.The reports emphasizes the essential role that arts education programs move in improving student engagement and grammatical construction creativity. Dwyer discusses, in a lengthy and wordy overview, the up-to-date Arts Education programs and policies shortcomings. It is widely agreed that the U. S. state-supported education system is not adequately religious service a significant portion of our nations children and that public K-12 schools must change dramatically o achieve the Administrations goal that the coupled States become a global leader in postsecondary attainment by 2020 School leaders and teachers will need to step u p to the challenge of finding new ways to engage many more students in meaningful learning (27) More importantly, this report discusses possible solutions such as reinvesting in arts education, and argues for creating arts-rich schools that can engage students in ways that full complement the study of the arts and other traditional subjects such as literature, history, science, and mathematics.Another key takeaway from this report is it shows readers the link between arts education and transaction in other subjects. Being that this source is a report by the Pre fountnts Committee on the Arts and the Humanities, it attempts to present inference to support the positions of the president and his corresponding policy-making party. As political and wordy as this report is it would most promising benefit someone looking into the politics side of arts education, it would not be as helpful for someone looking for developmental and long term benefits of art involvement in schools.Rabkin , Hedberg. 2011. Arts Education in America What the Declines Mean for Arts Participation. base on the 2008 Survey of Public Participation in the Arts. National Endowment for the Arts. (Research Report 52). Web. 24 Jan. 2013. This report presents its findings after researching important question related to arts education in America. Questions like Has participation in arts programs declined? What does it mean for teachers and students? How has this affected participation in other extracurricular activities?How does this affect support for programs? The article presents the questions to the reader and then follows up with information that supports both positive and negative claims about the answer. Charts are use when needed to simplify information into an easily predigested visual aid. There are numerous sources use as evidence for the information presented, as intumesce as suggestions for further investigation into the questions presented. This report has a very neutral stance to wards the information presented.There is good information presented for varying arguments and the ultimate end is left to the reader. This source would be a join report to use in a work, oddly if in an argumentative essay you need information for the view that opposes yours. However for someone looking for extremely specific information this report will all be useful for an introduction into the questions being asked about the national education programs. Oxtoby, David W. 2012. The Place of Arts in Liberal Education. Liberal Education, v98 n2 p36-41 Spr 2012.Oxtoby uses a great carry off of logical system to explain his opinion on the come out of arts in liberal education and he uses statistics to support his views. In his article, he states that diversity in the curriculum is a keystone to success in any liberal education program. He similarly claims that part of that diversity needs to include a program where students can express their creativity. Being able to express the ir creativity and the stimulation provided by arts programs lead to more successful students, both in academics, community involvement, and professional work environments.This article is a good source of simple and sound logic in support of arts programs being include in all liberal education. Oxtobys statements and presentation of the information is biased towards supports arts programs, but he always includes evidence to support his ideas. Also, while he does not approve of excluding arts in liberal education there is never any negativeness in his statements, only more supporting evidence for his ideas. Some readers will find this article to be dry and uninteresting unless they already have some knowledge and opinions on the place of arts in education programs.